top of page

Star Trek V Re-Watch


I recently rewatched Star Trek V: The Final Frontier. Why? I don’t know. Mostly nostalgia. And curiosity for what I would think of it today. (I had to do it five or six sittings.)


Folks...this movie is bad. I know there are people on Facebook who adore it and want to see a new cut with corrected visual effects. Alas, I am not one of those people.


I remember seeing it opening night with my high school pal Jonah Walker at the old Edgartown Town Hall, and our hearts just sank. It was perhaps fitting that the film froze and burned in the brig scene, and the screen went black for five minutes before coming back.


Star Trek IV had been so good, and The Next Generation had brought back Star Trek on a weekly basis, even though at that time (the end of season two) it was woefully uneven.


But this fercockt movie...sigh...


I remember enjoying it as a teen fan for the same reasons I rewatched it: 1) It’s still Star Trek, 2) it’s got the original cast, and 3) Jerry Goldsmith’s score.


But the jokes were stupid even to 15-year-old me, and when it was over, I remember Jonah and I saying something along the lines of, “Well I liked it fine, but I don’t think regular people will get it.”


And sure enough, bombs away—it was virtually gone from theaters by the time Batman stomped everything a few weeks later.


So it’s true the visual effects are terrible, and it was a fatal mistake for the filmmakers to turn to Bran Ferren rather than use the “C team” at ILM (which was I think the excuse they gave, they couldn’t get the primo guys at ILM).


But it’s really the story. Shatner wanted to do a movie about finding God—literally.


That’s such a dopey idea for any movie. Obviously, you’d be mixing theology and reality in a way that is sure to offend and disappoint massive parts of the audience! And especially in a Star Trek film, which always prized science...?


This is why the piano does not write the concerto!


So it got transformed into a story about finding a false God—so it’s already a letdown. Plus it’s really Sybok’s story (though I do like Laurence Luckinbill’s performance), our characters are just along for the ride.


Beyond that, it’s just full of so many storytelling mistakes. The characters act so stupidly, falling into traps and going on a mission with a broken ship (for no reason).


And the jokes! How could nobody say, “Guys, we’re shooting ourselves in the head here”? The humor in Star Trek IV came organically from the fish-out-of-water story. Here, it’s degrading our characters.


I can’t stand it. But I guess it’s not worth belaboring. The lesson is that the difference between something being really good and really bad...well, it can be way less than you think.


It usually comes down to somebody in charge (and I mean, one person) who has good taste—who will put his or her foot down and say, “No, we’re not doing that.”


For Star Trek, it’s pretty clear that without Nicholas Meyer and/or Leonard Nimoy on those first six movies, they were at sea.


So, there you go. This movie did at least lead to the all-time best letter in Starlog magazine: Why are they putting seatbelts in theaters this summer?

“To keep the audience from leaving!!”

Thanks, John Stanowski!

217 views5 comments

Recent Posts

See All

5 Comments


excession30
excession30
Jun 14, 2023

Ed Wood was a major directorial influence here. "The Greatest Film Since 'Plan 9 From Outer Space' "

Like

Scott McIntyre
Scott McIntyre
Nov 22, 2022

That letter is a classic. Funny thing is fans on social media make that exact same comment and think they invented it (or want us to think they did). I love Facebook shut ins. 🤣


I love this movie, by the way. More than TVH. But that's pretty much just me and Bill Shatner...

Like

Sean Nethery
Sean Nethery
Oct 27, 2022

Is it wrong that my wife and I regularly say "I NEED my pain!"?😉


Terrible movie, but I still watch it every few years. It's Star Trek - there is no comparison.

Like

Amer Zahid
Amer Zahid
Oct 04, 2022

I vividly remember reading this letter in Starlog. And boy! Nimoy did that Superman move so well that I fell off my chair. The movie was a Turkey. Dead on arrival. The visual FX were ridiculous in a SUPERMAN IV sort of the way. But only Jerry Goldsmiths terrific and rip roaring score made it bearable .

Like

John Schuermann
John Schuermann
Oct 04, 2022

I started watching the new 4K transfer the other night. This movie is godawful. And, like you, I remember my heart sinking the first time I saw it in the theater. On walking out I remarked to my friend that it was literally one of the worst movies I had ever seen. He agreed.


There are exactly two good scenes in it - the opening with Sybok in the desert, and the scene where McCoy lives out his pain. The rest of the pain in the movie comes from those horrible jokes, and Shatner's hyperactive performance ("you mean he's your brother brother?!?!").


I just don't get the retroactive good reviews it has been getting, especially from people whose opinions I…

Like
bottom of page